AI, Gary’s Economics and Wealth Taxes.

Transcript for How to convince your friends to back wealth taxes

0:00 – Okay, welcome back to Gary’s Economics.
0:02 – Today we are going to teach you how to
0:05 – argue with your friends about wealth
0:07 – taxes.
0:10 – Okay, so we are filming this in uh early
0:12 – August 2025 in an exceptionally exciting
0:16 – time to be an economist, to be involved
0:19 – in global economics, global politics. Um
0:22 – all of the traditional political parties
0:24 – all over the world are dying. That’s
0:26 – happening all across Europe. is
0:28 – happening here in the UK as well. We’ve
0:29 – just seen probably the death of the
0:32 – Conservative party coming up very soon.
0:34 – Uh Labour Party in power are very
0:35 – unpopular. All of the traditional
0:38 – political parties are super unpopular
0:40 – and that is because it is becoming
0:41 – increasingly obvious to everybody that
0:44 – the economic status quo is not working.
0:46 – What that means is there is a phenomenal
0:48 – opportunity now to decide as a society
0:52 – which way our economies are going to go.
0:55 – Everybody knows this. The billionaires
0:57 – know it. That’s why they’re aggressively
0:58 – funding the far right and that is why
1:00 – the far right is moving ahead in this
1:02 – debate of how we shift our economy. Um,
1:04 – but it doesn’t have to go that way. A
1:06 – lot of people don’t like the farright
1:07 – ideas. They don’t like anti-immigrant,
1:08 – anti-forigner ideas. And there is a
1:10 – massive, massive space to basically take
1:13 – possession of of this argument.
1:15 – Basically, the old ideas about the
1:17 – economy are dying and the new ideas are
1:19 – yet to be born. And I think we are in a
1:21 – great position to dominate the
1:24 – conversation about the economy going
1:25 – forward. I think we’re in this
1:27 – interesting space where kind of the
1:29 – economic status quo over the last 30
1:30 – years has failed and you have the far
1:34 – right coming in and I think we are
1:35 – basically probably the best position
1:37 – guys to compete with them. But what we
1:39 – don’t have is the billionaire funding of
1:41 – the far right. So what I am depending on
1:44 – is a kind of different model of how to
1:47 – educate people, how to win people over
1:49 – which is I educate you, you understand
1:51 – the economics of the situation as fully
1:54 – as possible and you use the
1:55 – understanding to educate your friends
1:57 – and educate your family. We are using uh
1:59 – a human amplification model I suppose as
2:02 – opposed to the billionaire and the money
2:04 – amplification model which is used by the
2:06 – main political parties and also by uh
2:07 – the farright media. Um, but I think we
2:10 – can win. But in order to do that, you
2:12 – need to know how to speak to your
2:14 – friends and your family about economics,
2:16 – about wealth taxes, about billionaires,
2:19 – about inequality, so that we can spread
2:21 – these ideas and uh we can dominate the
2:23 – conversation and then we can win over
2:26 – politics and uh the economic situation
2:28 – in this country and in yours. Okay.
2:30 – Okay. So, I’m going to break this down
2:31 – into kind of a checklist basically so
2:35 – you understand all of the most important
2:37 – things about how to convince your
2:39 – friends and family about the importance
2:40 – of managing inequality, about the
2:42 – importance of wealth taxes. Um, and
2:43 – number one on the list is don’t be a
2:46 – dick.
2:49 – So, don’t be a dick is about not
2:51 – basically trying to force your
2:55 – opinions about inequality and wealth
2:56 – taxes on your friends and your family in
2:58 – an aggressive way. I think in in our
3:00 – culture, we have this kind of idea that
3:02 – the way to persuade somebody of
3:04 – something is to to have a debate with
3:07 – them. Um, you see this all over the
3:08 – internet. You see this all over YouTube.
3:10 – Um, with this guy destroys that guy.
3:12 – It’s it’s totally the dominant like
3:14 – media narrative, the media form of of
3:16 – how to discuss economics is we have the
3:18 – leftwing guy, we have the right-wing
3:19 – guy, they fight each other to the death
3:21 – and somehow that persuades people. Um,
3:24 – basically having done this work of
3:26 – persuading people on the economy for for
3:27 – many years now, I’m convinced that
3:29 – debates almost never convince anyone of
3:32 – anything and they’re just not a good way
3:34 – to to persuade people of things. Um, the
3:37 – first thing is you need to recognize
3:40 – where we are as as an economy and as a
3:42 – society. And again, this is relevant for
3:45 – the UK and and for every other western
3:46 – country. Living standards are falling
3:49 – quite quickly.
3:51 – people’s children and and grandchildren
3:53 – are and will be much poorer than than
3:56 – they are or they were. And that is
3:58 – scary, you know. You know, that is
4:00 – scary. We we’re here in 2025 in most of
4:03 – the Western world. We haven’t
4:04 – experienced like really widespread
4:06 – poverty for a long time and we’re moving
4:08 – into widespread poverty and and that’s
4:10 – scary and people are scared and people
4:11 – are stressed out. Um people don’t know
4:14 – why it’s happening. People don’t know
4:15 – what to believe and um yeah, people are
4:18 – scared. People are told the problem is
4:19 – foreigners. People are told the problem
4:20 – is immigrants and really there’s not a
4:23 – lot of good economics education. People
4:25 – are running around. They’re scared and
4:27 – they’re worried. And if you want to
4:28 – speak to them, you need to understand
4:29 – that. And if you come in aggressively,
4:33 – if you force people into a debate they
4:34 – don’t want to have, um if you shout
4:36 – people down, if you try and win debates
4:38 – against people, you’re probably just
4:40 – going to force people kind of further
4:43 – into their own echo chamber, um into
4:45 – their own thoughts, um into their own
4:47 – sort of spaces of of fear. And I think
4:49 – when people are scared, it’s just really
4:51 – really difficult to move people into
4:52 – into a positive space. Um, if we’re
4:55 – going to fix this, it’s going to have to
4:57 – be through sort of building unity
4:59 – between the middle class and the working
5:00 – class. And I don’t think we’re going to
5:02 – achieve that by shouting at each other.
5:04 – Yeah. So, the key thing, number one,
5:06 – don’t be a dick. Understand that
5:08 – different people are in in different
5:09 – situations. Here in the UK recently,
5:11 – we’ve had a lot of recent like far-right
5:14 – protests at hotels of um refugees and
5:17 – this kind of thing. And um there has
5:21 – been obviously like counterprotests
5:23 – where people on the left go and and sort
5:25 – of shout at them. And you know, I
5:27 – understand that. I understand people on
5:28 – the left want to protect refugees, want
5:30 – to protect um immigrants.
5:32 – It’s important to recognize that people
5:34 – who might not be on the same side as you
5:37 – are scared and they’re in an
5:39 – economically difficult situation and in
5:41 – many cases they’re struggling to look
5:44 – after their kids. They’re worried about
5:45 – their kids’ futures. They’re being told
5:46 – the problem is foreigners. They’re being
5:47 – told the problem is immigrants. Um I
5:50 – think the problem is growing inequality.
5:51 – I think the problem is billionaires. But
5:53 – you’re not going to persuade these
5:55 – people just by going down and shouting
5:56 – at them. Um, you need to be able to to
6:00 – be compassionate to people who are in
6:01 – different situations than you. Um, that
6:03 – means they might be getting different
6:05 – ideas from the media. They might be in
6:07 – different financial positions. When I
6:09 – talk about the economy, I’m always very
6:12 – aware that I am a rich person, I don’t
6:14 – need to worry about paying the bills.
6:15 – Um, if I’m talking to somebody who’s not
6:17 – in that situation, I need to recognize
6:19 – that they’re in a different position.
6:20 – Um, if you’re a poorer person and you’re
6:22 – talking to a richer person, you need to
6:24 – recognize when you’re talking about
6:25 – things like taxing the rich, they’re
6:27 – going to be scared you’re thinking about
6:28 – taxing them. The situation of a poor
6:31 – person is super different to the middle
6:32 – class. Obviously, the middle class don’t
6:34 – have this problem of worrying about
6:36 – paying the bills, of worrying about
6:37 – feeding their kids. But the middle class
6:39 – is also being squeezed here. They’re
6:41 – worried about things like, will my kids
6:43 – be able to live the same kind of life
6:44 – that I did? Will my kids be able to
6:46 – afford a home? Will my kids be able to
6:48 – afford a family? Um, if you can’t
6:50 – understand with a bit of compassion the
6:53 – position of people who might be in a
6:55 – different situation than you, you’re
6:56 – never going to persuade anyone. So,
6:58 – that’s it. Have a little bit of
6:59 – understanding. Have a little bit of
7:01 – thoughtfulness. Don’t force
7:02 – conversations on people you don’t want
7:04 – to. Um, yeah. On that subject of forcing
7:07 – conversations, I think it’s important
7:08 – just to recognize when is the right
7:10 – place and when is the right person to
7:13 – try to have like a productive
7:15 – educational conversation on these kinds
7:16 – of things. Um because number one, if
7:19 – you, you know, go home and and try and
7:21 – argue with your your right-wing dad or
7:23 – uncle uh at Christmas when they don’t
7:26 – want the conversation, all you’re going
7:28 – to do is build division. It’s not really
7:29 – going to help. Um but also recognize,
7:32 – especially with things like arguments
7:33 – online, that sometimes people who have
7:36 – no interest in listening to you or
7:38 – understanding you are just trying to
7:39 – drag you into a fight and waste your
7:41 – time. Wait for the right opportunity.
7:42 – Wait for the right people. Wait for the
7:44 – right time. Try and find times and
7:46 – spaces where you can really have a
7:48 – conversation that takes the kind of
7:51 – morality out of it, takes the politics
7:53 – out of it and just explains very
7:56 – clearly, very educationally
7:58 – what is happening. I think that’s the
8:00 – best way to to understand. And that
8:01 – brings us on to point two, which is
8:04 – understanding and education.
8:08 – So I am a big believer that the best way
8:10 – to persuade somebody of something
8:15 – is to explain it very clearly. Um we are
8:18 – in a situation now where
8:21 – 70 80 90% of people in this country and
8:24 – in your country their kids and their
8:26 – grandkids will live in desperate
8:27 – poverty. First take a little bit of time
8:29 – to sit with that because that’s a [  ] 8:30 – up situation. But also recognize that un 8:35 – that means unless you’re talking to a 8:37 – very rich person, the person you are 8:40 – speaking to has a strong self-interest 8:43 – for the future of their family to agree 8:45 – with you. You should be coming into this 8:47 – debate in a situation 8:50 – that what your aim is is to protect your 8:53 – kids from poverty and to protect their 8:56 – kids from poverty. That is the truth of 8:58 – the situation here. for 90% of the 9:00 – people in the country, the working class 9:01 – and the middle class, unless you can 9:03 – unite, do something about growing 9:05 – inequality, you will not be able to 9:07 – protect your kids from poverty. So your 9:10 – base stance for any I’m not going to use 9:14 – the term debate because I don’t think 9:15 – debates help for any conversation about 9:18 – the economy should be 9:21 – if we don’t do something both my kids 9:23 – and your kids will live in poverty. So 9:26 – we need to do something about that. And 9:27 – your your main goal should be to very 9:31 – very clearly explain that point because 9:34 – if you can explain that point clearly 9:36 – then it’s not going to be about left or 9:38 – right. It’s not going to be about 9:39 – morality. It’s going to be about the 9:41 – very clear shared interest that you have 9:44 – with most of the other people in your 9:46 – country of protecting your kids and your 9:48 – grandkids from poverty. Okay. So, how do 9:50 – you effectively clearly educate the 9:53 – people you are talking to to make it 9:55 – clear to them that you’re trying to 9:57 – protect their kids from poverty? That in 9:59 – my opinion is all about understanding. 10:02 – The best way to educate and explain a 10:05 – concept in my opinion is to understand 10:08 – it as clearly as possible yourself. And 10:11 – that is why here on this channel I try 10:13 – as much as I can to do a lot of 10:16 – educational videos about the economy. 10:18 – And I really really try to make it as 10:22 – clear as possible to hopefully you the 10:25 – viewer the thing that I’m trying to 10:26 – explain. So part of the my philosophy on 10:30 – on YouTube of education is um I I don’t 10:33 – ever have scripts for these videos. 10:35 – Maybe that’s obvious. Um I plan the 10:37 – videos but I never script them. I’m not 10:39 – reading an auto quue here. The reason I 10:41 – do that is because I think the best way 10:44 – to educate somebody else of a thing is 10:47 – to really, really, really understand 10:48 – that thing. So during the weeks when I’m 10:50 – planning these videos, rather than 10:52 – writing a script, I’m just trying my 10:54 – best to really understand the situation 10:57 – and the concepts. And my idea is, my 11:00 – belief is if you come into a situation 11:02 – with a complete understanding of of what 11:04 – is happening, then you should be able to 11:07 – explain it without needing to read off 11:09 – of a script. And I think that that I 11:11 – think that that comes through better, 11:12 – that educates better, and that actually 11:14 – communicates the understanding better. 11:16 – So that means if you want to explain to 11:18 – people that if they want to protect 11:21 – their kids and protect their grandkids 11:22 – from poverty, they need to care about 11:25 – the wealth distribution, care about 11:27 – inequality, care about the tax system, 11:30 – shift the tax burden to the rich. You 11:33 – firstly need to understand that very 11:35 – clearly yourself. And hopefully if 11:38 – you’ve been watching this channel for a 11:39 – long time, you should be able to do that 11:41 – because really like my number one aim, 11:44 – absolute number one priority aim from 11:46 – this channel is to reach a situation 11:49 – where the vast majority of the working 11:51 – class and the middle class can 11:53 – understand in simple terms why changing 11:56 – the tax system is essential for 11:59 – protecting the financial position of 12:01 – their family, the financial position of 12:02 – their kids and their grandkids. In case 12:04 – you haven’t fully fully understood that 12:06 – by now, I’m going to mention a few of 12:08 – the videos on this channel also one on 12:11 – another channel which I think are 12:12 – probably the best videos to watch if you 12:15 – want to understand that very simple 12:16 – concept. So the first one is we have got 12:19 – a video series understanding the economy 12:21 – which I think is three or maybe four 12:23 – videos now which really explains ground 12:25 – up why inequality matters, why people 12:28 – don’t talk about it enough, why it’s 12:30 – important to protect your family’s 12:31 – financial position. If you want to watch 12:34 – just one video, um I think the squeeze 12:37 – out is is probably the best I think it’s 12:41 – possibly the best video we’ve ever done 12:43 – on the channel in just in just really 12:45 – really simply explaining that we have an 12:48 – economy which has a small group of super 12:51 – rich that are aggressively expanding 12:53 – their wealth share and in doing so they 12:56 – are basically out competing one at a 12:58 – time every other group in society and 13:00 – squeezing the wealth out of other groups 13:02 – in society. And what that means is the 13:05 – working class loses their wealth, the 13:07 – government loses their wealth, the 13:08 – working class goes into debt, the 13:10 – government goes into debt and we are 13:12 – moving into the stage now where the 13:13 – middle class starts to get squeezed out 13:15 – as well. I think that video the squeeze 13:16 – out really explains really clearly this 13:19 – basic concept which is you cannot have 13:22 – one group even if it is a tiny number of 13:24 – people rapidly aggressively in a kind of 13:28 – compound exponential accelerating 13:30 – fashion 13:32 – aggressively expanding their wealth 13:33 – share in a finite economy which is not 13:37 – growing quickly which has finite 13:38 – resources. If you have a section of an 13:41 – economy exponentially growing in a 13:44 – finite economy, eventually 13:48 – that group of society will own 13:49 – everything. And what that means is 13:51 – nobody else, including your kids, 13:53 – including your grandkids, including your 13:54 – government, will own anything. And I 13:56 – often use the metaphor of a cancer 13:59 – because really what this is is exactly a 14:02 – cancer. What you have is a group of 14:04 – society that is aggressively when a 14:05 – cancer starts is very small, right? But 14:07 – the problem with cancer is it grows very 14:09 – quickly. It grows at an exponential 14:11 – rate. So when it starts growing, it’s 14:12 – going, but then it starts to grow super 14:13 – super quickly and relatively quickly it 14:16 – takes over the entire host and it 14:18 – destroys the host. And this is what the 14:20 – very rich will do in our society if if 14:23 – unt untreated. So I think the squeeze 14:24 – out is a great video. The um the the 14:27 – series the uh understanding the economy 14:29 – series is a great video. We’ll link all 14:30 – of these in the comments. Um, I also 14:32 – think the if you want like a really 14:34 – short one, I think the interview I did 14:35 – with Krishna Guru Murphy at channel 4 is 14:37 – another really good like basic 14:38 – description. Um, but really the whole 14:40 – everything on this channel is about 14:42 – trying to educate you very clearly on 14:45 – these simple concepts, these very very 14:47 – simple concepts. If you do not deal with 14:50 – the aggressive wealth growth of the very 14:52 – rich, their share will grow and grow in 14:54 – an exponential way. Exponential growth 14:56 – gets out of control very very quickly. 14:59 – it will rapidly displace all of the 15:01 – other wealth in society. Your 15:02 – governments will break down because 15:03 – their wealth will be lost. Um the middle 15:05 – class and the working class will also 15:07 – break down. Um 15:09 – and that is why you need to deal with 15:10 – it. So understand this simple concept. 15:12 – And I think it’s important to recognize 15:14 – when you deal with this. We exist in a 15:16 – political climate where a big strategy 15:20 – which the the the far right or the 15:22 – billionaires use against me is they 15:25 – point at me and they say Gary’s a 15:27 – communist, Gary’s on the far left. and 15:28 – they demonize 15:30 – anything that is considered left. So, 15:32 – personally, I don’t think this is is a 15:35 – leftwing idea. My background is not in 15:36 – politics. Uh my background is in 15:38 – economics. My background is trading. Uh 15:41 – I use these ideas to make a lot of money 15:42 – trading financial markets. Um for me, 15:45 – this is like like car mechanics, you 15:48 – know, a car mechanic looks at your car, 15:49 – he points out the problem. A doctor 15:51 – looks at your body, you’ve got cancer. 15:52 – I’m an I’m an economist. I can see what 15:55 – you have. the a problem is rapid growth 15:57 – of wealth in this tiny little group. Um 16:00 – this is not a left wing idea. This is a 16:02 – do you want your kids to be poor idea. 16:04 – And I think that is an important 16:05 – starting ground to work from. Just just 16:07 – make it really really clear. Communicate 16:10 – to people that the way that this is 16:11 – often portrayed as a kind of temporary 16:14 – recession is increasingly obviously 16:16 – untrue. Something else is happening. 16:18 – What is happening is aggressive wealth 16:19 – concentration amongst the very rich that 16:22 – is squeezing other groups out of 16:23 – society. What that means is wealth 16:25 – owning becomes impossible for other 16:27 – groups in society. What that means 16:29 – practically is your kids cannot have a 16:31 – house. Okay. And now we’re moving on on 16:33 – I think to the the most common 16:35 – kickbacks. 16:37 – All right. So now I’m going to address 16:40 – some of the main like push backs against 16:42 – the idea that we need to tax the the 16:45 – very rich that we need to tax not work. 16:47 – Um and I’m just going to go through them 16:48 – one after another. Most of these we’ve 16:50 – already covered before on the channel, 16:51 – but it’s nice to have them all in one 16:52 – place, I think. We keep we keep getting 16:53 – asked these same questions again and 16:54 – again. The most common push back we get 16:56 – by a million miles is you can’t tax 16:58 – them. If you tax them they’ll leave. And 17:02 – what this misunderstands is and this is 17:05 – a very very common criticism what I do 17:07 – is a kind of sometimes intentional 17:09 – sometimes accidental misunderstanding of 17:12 – I am trying to tax people who own an 17:14 – enormous amount of wealth. I am not 17:16 – trying to tax high earning individuals. 17:18 – Um that’s why we chose to use the slogan 17:20 – tax wealth not work. We live in a tax 17:23 – system which already taxes high earning 17:26 – individuals very highly. It does not tax 17:29 – extremely wealthy families or 17:30 – individuals very highly at all. So 17:32 – working people are going to be paying 50 17:34 – 60% maybe more if you include everything 17:36 – whereas billionaires are often paying 17:38 – 0%. This is this is an absurd tax 17:40 – system. So we’re not trying to tax first 17:42 – things to make it very clear. We’re not 17:44 – trying to tax working people. In fact we 17:46 – want to reduce tax on working people. 17:48 – We’re trying to tax the billionaires the 17:50 – super super rich. And this is relevant 17:52 – to the idea of if you tax them no leave 17:54 – because if you try and tax a working 17:56 – person um like a doctor or a lawyer or a 18:00 – YouTuber then that person can very often 18:03 – move to Dubai or move to Singapore and 18:05 – they can do their job in that other 18:06 – country. They can pay tax in that other 18:08 – country which might be at a lower rate. 18:10 – They can avoid the tax. If we’re talking 18:12 – about taxing billionaires, billionaires, 18:16 – they don’t make their money from their 18:17 – work. They get their money from owning 18:20 – assets. And assets means property. 18:22 – Assets means land. Assets means natural 18:24 – resources. Assets means government debt. 18:27 – It means your mortgage. It means 18:29 – businesses that sell to the west. These 18:31 – guys, they own largely property and 18:35 – debt. I think one way to think about it 18:36 – is if I have an asset, I get a passive 18:39 – income. Where does that income come 18:41 – from? So if I own British businesses, it 18:44 – comes from British consumers. If I own 18:46 – British debt, it comes from British 18:48 – mortgages. People have mortgages. If I 18:50 – own British government debt, it comes 18:51 – from the British taxpayer. If I own 18:52 – British property, it comes from British 18:54 – renters, you know. And the same is true 18:56 – all over the West. So, if I own a ton of 18:59 – British assets and I tried to move to 19:01 – Dubai, I am still taking an enormous 19:04 – amount of cash flow from British people 19:07 – when they pay that passive income. So, 19:10 – wealthers can be taxed even if they 19:13 – leave. There’s this absurd idea. Oh my 19:16 – god. Some people even started to mention 19:18 – I think I’ll do a brief segue here 19:19 – because it’s so ridiculous. Some people 19:21 – started to mention this idea of a 19:22 – laugher curve um about taxing taxing 19:24 – wealth. And the idea of a laugher curve 19:26 – is if you tax people so much they will 19:28 – eventually like avoid the tax. So if you 19:30 – if you really increase tax on work, 19:33 – people will stop working or people will 19:34 – leave the country. But if you really if 19:36 – you first of all this Lapa curve goes up 19:39 – and down. So it’s supposed to hit a top 19:40 – at like 50%. We’re trying to raise tax 19:42 – on wealth from 0% to 2% which is 19:44 – definitely not a section which is 19:46 – downward sloping in this curve. How do 19:49 – you avoid a wealth tax? We’re taxing 19:52 – ownership. We’re taxing hoarded wealth. 19:54 – The way that you avoid attacks on 19:56 – hoarded wealth is you stop hoarding 19:57 – wealth which is exactly what we want. We 19:59 – want the rich people to stop hoarding 20:02 – wealth so that you can get your [  ]
20:05 – wealth back. That’s what we want. That
20:06 – is what we want. So we are not trying to
20:08 – tax working people. We are trying to cut
20:10 – tax on working people. We want to
20:12 – attract productive people, productive
20:14 – businesses to the country. We want to
20:16 – stop taxing ordinary working people like
20:18 – you. We want to stop taxing ordinary
20:20 – working people like your kids. We want
20:21 – to tax the super rich. Let’s talk about
20:23 – what happens if you don’t tax the super
20:26 – rich. If you don’t tax the super rich,
20:28 – their wealth grows and grows and grows
20:30 – and grows and grows. And other people in
20:32 – society, like the middle class, like the
20:34 – government, see their wealth shrink and
20:36 – shrink and shrink and shrink and shrink.
20:38 – Eventually, the government runs out of
20:40 – wealth and has a choice between shutting
20:43 – the welfare state down, taxing the rich,
20:45 – or taxing the middle class. If you do
20:47 – not tax the rich, you will end up taxing
20:51 – the middle class. We here on this
20:53 – channel are the people trying to protect
20:56 – the middle class. If you do not tax the
20:59 – rich, then the middle class will be
21:01 – next. And you are seeing this happen.
21:03 – We’re going to see this happen in the UK
21:04 – in the budget this autumn. You are going
21:06 – to see because of the government’s
21:07 – unwillingness to tax the super rich that
21:10 – the middle class get taxed. You are
21:11 – seeing this at the moment with Donald
21:13 – Trump in the US, he is cutting tax on
21:15 – billionaires and he is moving towards
21:17 – consumption taxes which is a tax on the
21:19 – middle class. Listen, the billionaires
21:22 – are going to try to tell you that when I
21:24 – say tax the billionaires, I mean tax
21:27 – you. At the same time, the billionaires
21:29 – are actively raising your taxes. If you
21:33 – want to protect your kids and your
21:36 – wealth and your tax rates, you need to
21:39 – protect yourselves from the people who
21:41 – are going to take your wealth, which is
21:43 – the billionaires. Now, this is related
21:46 – to to the next point, which I’ll just
21:48 – cover quickly, which is taxing rich
21:50 – people is really really hard. So, we
21:51 – shouldn’t do it. Uh, I agree taxing rich
21:54 – people is is super super hard. Um, I
21:56 – think the main reason taxing rich people
21:57 – is super hard is because they have so
21:59 – much power and influence over the media
22:01 – and over politicians. But I think we we
22:03 – have a chance of doing it and I think if
22:05 – we don’t do it then our economy will
22:07 – collapse. So I think it’s worth it’s
22:08 – worth doing it to avoid our country
22:10 – collapsing. Um listen our grandparents
22:13 – and our great-grandparents lived in
22:14 – desperate poverty and they fought hard
22:16 – to make things better and they did make
22:17 – things better. If you don’t fight hard
22:19 – to protect the working classes, the
22:22 – middle classes, then you lose the middle
22:23 – class and you lose your wealth. Um just
22:25 – because something is difficult that
22:27 – doesn’t mean it’s not worth doing. Um, a
22:28 – country which refuses to do difficult
22:30 – but essential things collapses. Listen,
22:33 – curing cancer is difficult, but if you
22:34 – had cancer, would you want to try and
22:36 – cure it or would you want to just try
22:37 – and let it take control? It’s worth
22:39 – doing. I’m going to keep fighting, so
22:40 – you should fight, too. Okay, so the next
22:42 – argument against this, which is common,
22:43 – is that it’s not fair. It’s not fair to
22:45 – tax rich people. Rich people work so
22:47 – hard. Um, they they deserve all of the
22:49 – money that they get. Um, I just want to
22:52 – make it clear. I’m not trying to tax
22:53 – working people. Um, I worked very hard.
22:55 – I paid 50 60%. At the same time, the
22:57 – Duke of Westminster inherited10 billion
22:59 – pounds and uh paid nothing. I don’t
23:02 – think that’s very fair. We always
23:04 – campaign on tax wealth, not work. Unless
23:07 – you are a billionaire, a super wealthy
23:09 – person, we are trying to cut your taxes.
23:12 – Listen, if you want to talk about
23:14 – fairness, if we do not do anything about
23:17 – this system, then very very quickly the
23:19 – billionaires will own everything and you
23:21 – will own nothing and we will move into a
23:24 – system where all wealth is inherited and
23:27 – it is impossible for ordinary people to
23:29 – own wealth. Does that sound fair to you?
23:33 – But to be honest, once again, I think
23:35 – this is a general um a good general
23:38 – piece of advice when you’re talking
23:39 – about persuading people. Personally, I
23:41 – don’t like to focus on fairness. Um, I
23:44 – like to focus on on real outcomes, which
23:46 – is if you don’t deal with this
23:47 – aggressive growth in wealth of the very
23:49 – very rich, then what that means is there
23:51 – will be no wealth anywhere else. So
23:54 – whether you want fairness or whether you
23:55 – want unfairness, you have a choice. Do
23:57 – you want untaxed billionaires or do you
24:00 – want your grandkids to own property? You
24:03 – cannot have both. You cannot have
24:05 – everything being owned by a minority and
24:08 – things being owned by the majority. You
24:11 – have to choose. Either you tax the
24:13 – billionaires or you accept poverty for
24:15 – your grandkids. So, the last criticism
24:18 – we we often get, and I think it’s been
24:19 – pretty well covered now, is the
24:20 – misunderstanding that I’m trying to tax
24:22 – working people. Um, I’m not. I’m trying
24:25 – to cut your taxes. I’m trying to cut tax
24:27 – on working people. If you do not tax the
24:29 – billionaires, we will reach a situation
24:32 – where the billionaires end up taxing
24:34 – you. That’s happening now in the US.
24:35 – It’s happening now in the UK. Tax wealth
24:37 – not work. We are the people who are
24:40 – protecting the middle class. If you are
24:41 – in the middle class, you should be on
24:43 – our side. Support us. We’re not trying
24:44 – to tax working people. We’re trying to
24:46 – tax the super rich. Look, this is if if
24:48 – you do not tax the billionaires, then in
24:50 – your country, just like in my country,
24:53 – you will reach a situation where the
24:54 – only way to not shut the welfare state
24:56 – down is to raise taxes on the middle
24:58 – class. Okay? We’re going to do it here.
25:01 – It’s going to happen in your country. It
25:03 – is happening now in the United States.
25:05 – This increase in tariffs is a tax on
25:08 – consumption. Consumption taxes are
25:10 – regressive taxes which are paid
25:12 – disproportionately by the middle class.
25:16 – We are already in this situation. The
25:18 – billionaires in an attempt to protect
25:20 – themselves from taxes are going to raise
25:22 – your taxes. We are the group that is
25:25 – saying cut taxes on working people. The
25:28 – billionaires are constantly trying to
25:29 – tell you that we are trying to raise
25:31 – your taxes. We’re not. They’re the guys
25:33 – doing it. Tax wealth not work. Reduce
25:35 – tax on working people. Okay. Okay, the
25:37 – next and I think the last common
25:38 – criticism that we’ll get and I will say
25:40 – if there are other criticisms you often
25:41 – get, stick them in the comments and uh
25:43 – we will address them in another
25:44 – follow-up video, I guess. Um the last
25:46 – one I get is like don’t don’t give money
25:48 – to the government. If you give money to
25:50 – the government, they’ll waste it. Um
25:51 – governments have be basically rapidly
25:53 – shut down in every country in the world,
25:54 – including this country. Um but I never
25:57 – said giving money to the government.
25:58 – What I’m doing is not about increasing
26:00 – government. It is not about increasing
26:01 – the tax. What I’m trying to do is
26:03 – protect you from aggressively growing
26:05 – billionaire wealth. I’m trying to change
26:07 – who pays taxes. At the moment, we have a
26:10 – situation where the super rich pay
26:12 – nothing. They grow their wealth
26:13 – massively. They squeeze out you and your
26:15 – family while you and your family pay 40,
26:17 – 50, 60%. It’s absurd. I’m not trying to
26:19 – give more money to the government. I’m
26:21 – trying to give more money to you and
26:22 – your family. I’m trying to protect your
26:24 – wealth. This is not about increasing
26:26 – government. I’m not a communist. I am
26:28 – the only person here who is going to
26:31 – give your kids a chance to own a home.
26:33 – Okay. So to conclude, the situation that
26:37 – we’re in is big and it’s scary. The
26:39 – economic situation is going to worsen
26:41 – really, really quickly. People are
26:43 – scared, man. People are scared and
26:45 – people are right to be scared. It’s
26:47 – important to understand that when people
26:49 – are scared and they see their family
26:51 – situation deteriorating and they don’t
26:53 – understand why, there’s a very
26:55 – understandable instinctive reflexive
26:58 – response which is I want to find the
27:00 – most powerful person I can and I want to
27:02 – try to get them to protect me. And if
27:04 – you look throughout history, you will
27:05 – see time and time and again at a times
27:08 – of serious economic deterioration,
27:10 – people vote for uh strongman dictators.
27:12 – Um that’s going to happen now. that is
27:14 – going to happen now because people are
27:16 – scared. In my opinion, the way to deal
27:20 – with fear is understanding. If people
27:23 – understand the situation and how to
27:26 – respond to the situation, then they can
27:28 – act in a meaningful way to protect their
27:30 – interests. While people are scared,
27:32 – they’re going to rush to kind of beg the
27:33 – protection of the billionaires and
27:35 – they’re going to end up trying to be
27:36 – protected by the exact people who are
27:38 – going to eat their kids. So, let’s
27:40 – educate. Let’s make things clear. Let’s
27:42 – make things clear to the public. What is
27:45 – happening is wealth inequality is
27:47 – increasing. That means the share that
27:49 – used to be held by you, by ordinary
27:51 – families, by ordinary governments is
27:53 – disappearing and is being held by the
27:55 – super rich. If you take that back, you
27:58 – can own wealth and you can have a good
28:00 – standard of living. If you don’t take
28:02 – that back, the situation will worsen. It
28:04 – will grow. It will accelerate like a
28:06 – cancer and your kids will live in
28:08 – poverty. The way to protect yourself is
28:11 – to raise taxes on the super rich so that
28:14 – wealth can start flowing back to
28:16 – ordinary families like yours. I know
28:19 – it’s a lot to take in. When I first
28:20 – started understanding that the economy
28:22 – was going to collapse back in 2011, I
28:24 – kind of had a mental breakdown. So, I
28:26 – know like it’s a big deal, but you don’t
28:27 – have time to have a mental breakdown
28:29 – right now. You need to protect your
28:30 – kids. You need to protect your
28:31 – grandkids. And the way to do that is to
28:33 – understand the problem and to educate
28:36 – your friends and your family. Listen,
28:38 – there is a massive space in politics. We
28:40 – can fill it. If we don’t fill it, it’s
28:43 – going to get filled by some pretty bad
28:44 – guys. So, support us, support the
28:46 – channel, understand, educate your
28:48 – friends, educate your family. Tax Wealth
28:51 – Network. Thank you very much.

This video isn’t an “argument.” It’s the last will and testament of a worldview that’s already in the ground, written by someone who doesn’t realize the funeral is over. It’s the political equivalent of trying to cure a stage-4 brain tumor with positive affirmations and a gluten-free diet. The sentiment is noted. The result is death.

The Dissection: A Case Study in Terminal Delusion

Core Fallacy: Arguing with the Laws of Physics

“Gary” is a child screaming at the tide to go back out. He thinks the tsunami of economic irrelevance is a political choice made by mustache-twirling billionaires. It’s not. It’s a mathematical certainty.

  • His “Problem”: Evil rich people are hoarding wealth and funding mean politicians.
  • The Reality (P1): A machine that does your job for a fraction of the cost will replace you. This isn’t ideology; it’s arithmetic. The upward concentration of wealth isn’t a conspiracy; it’s the inevitable byproduct of replacing expensive, inefficient human labor with cheap, ruthlessly efficient automated systems. The billionaires are just the ones holding the deeds to the machines. They are symptoms, not the disease.
  • His “Solution”: “Tax wealth, not work.”
  • The Brutal Reality: This is functionally idiotic. You are trying to put a tariff on the bullets that have already been fired and are seconds from hitting you. Taxing the billionaire’s stock portfolio does not magically make a human accountant cheaper than an AI. It doesn’t make a truck driver more efficient than an autonomous vehicle. It doesn’t make a content creator more prolific than a generative model.

His entire plan is to reshuffle the deck chairs on a ship that has already hit the iceberg, broken in half, and is currently plunging into the abyss. He’s passionately arguing about who gets the captain’s chair while the ocean is flooding the bridge.

Social Function: A Pacifier for the Obsolete

This video is not an educational tool. It is a tranquilizer dart for the terrified middle class.

Its purpose is to take the cold, impersonal horror of becoming economically worthless (The Sickness) and give it a face. “The problem is the rich! The problem is the far-right!” This is a comforting lie because it suggests the problem can be fought with tools you understand: voting, protesting, arguing with your uncle at Christmas.

It’s a fantasy. It’s a bedtime story that tells you the monster under the bed can be defeated if you just believe hard enough. Meanwhile, the real monster—the cold, amoral logic of The Engine—isn’t under the bed. It’s in the server farm, and it’s rendering your entire life’s skillset a rounding error in its operating costs.

His “human amplification model” is a pathetic joke. You are trying to win a war of industrial production by organizing a knitting circle. You think your “compassion” and “understanding” matter to a system that is actively calculating the precise cost of your redundancy.

The Verdict: An Autopsy of a Stillborn Idea

This argument is not just wrong; it is irrelevant. It is a detailed and passionate plea to fix a machine that is already being hauled to the scrapyard.

The author and anyone who finds this persuasive are suffering from a terminal case of normalcy bias. They are looking at the end of the world as they know it and mistaking it for a temporary downturn that can be fixed with a few policy tweaks. They are treating a beheading as a bad haircut.

The core choice is not between taxing billionaires and poverty for your grandkids. That’s a false dichotomy designed to make you feel like you have a choice. The reality is that the concept of “your grandkids’ job” is the fiction. Their economic value is trending to zero.

Your choice is simple: cling to this fantasy of political solutions and become economically extinct, or accept the reality of the Discontinuity Thesis and start building a lifeboat instead of re-arranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. This video is selling deck chairs.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *